Wigner that the observer's mind determines reality, and that of Wheeler whereby an observer may be responsible for something happened in the distant past "anthropic principle", giving vent to wild fantasy is not always telling us that 2 + 2 are 4, that nothing exists, the subatomic indeterminacy can be extrapolated to good the first living organisms, etc. There are a number of ontological and epistemological principles tacitly involved in scientific research, among others: that the world exists by itself, which is composed of concrete objects, which forms do not exist by themselves but are properties of things, it is possible to know reality even if only partially and imperfectly.īut the new-epistemologists, on the theory of multiple universes of Everett and De Witt, on speculation E. That's why we speak of "multiple realities", deny logic and reason and willingly accept the "anything goes." But in science, things are different. It can not be clear because to be so weak and anemic reveal its base.
Newtonian Paradigm "? A science with a human face? "Feyerabend? "Chatter?Īn epistemology of the New Age is necessarily dark and twisted, contradictory and irrational. (Will scientists androids and we did not know?), Ending with our Of course fear of insanity. The authors of this jewel diagnosed our fears, we qualify debunkers manufacturers (so far nobody had tried to manufacturers), and speaks of Scientific Sentimental. "Why fear Agostinelli science with a human face, as defined by Andrew Ross at the New Age? Why continue to manufacture in 1993, rebuffed Legends? Why so fervently opposed to Scientific Sentimental? Perhaps because they fear a little madness among such accuracy and precision of Newtonian paradigm. The postmodern neoepistemólogo should always try Witchfinder inquisitors and scientists, and closed to anyone seeking evidence against the statement "A extragalactic elves like fontina cheese." You should always confuse science with technology, and inevitably have to mix ideology, poetry and hormone cocktail that "well prepared" gives pearls like this: So, a modern "theoretical breakthrough" must now decide in favor of epistemological anarchy, we must give equal value to astrology and astronomy, must be frankly acknowledged that progress is not possible, and if the Sabin vaccine had been applied in an African community in the twelfth century would not have taken effect because for them the "truth" was different and did not believe in it ( cultural relativism dixit). The "anything goes" united cultural relativism and a fun interpretations of quantum mechanics, they formed the mainstay pseudoepistemológico New Old Age.
#What the best laptop for djing free
Ranted in this science was not originally recommended giving free rein to the teaching of voodoo in college in the name of freedom of ideas, not to talk about objectivity, "is an illusion, a consequence of myopia theory of knowledge, "he said. The Prophet put the philosopher Paul Feyerabend, in the twentieth century gave a great boost to the New Age movement with his famous "Anything goes" (any-thing goes). Now the farmers of esotericism, quackery, vendors and healing talismans of cardboard, have intellectual / oides that will pave the way by providing a theoretical discourse that justifies their practices.
But a careful examination of the epistemology of the New Era "halo transforms this ridiculous and fragility. And if that pseudoscience is supported by "epistemologists" much better, because it acquires an aura of seriousness and solidity.
A skirt to hold on to." And what we offer in return? Uncertainty! Insecurity! "
0 kommentar(er)
